View Full Version : NEWSWEEK: Vatican Sex Sting
Spyder
10-18-2007, 04:14 PM
Yet another Catholic priest exposed.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/56555/?GT1=10450
What I thought was interesting:
"Others have long regarded Rome as a haven for gay priests, sent to the Vatican because they would not survive in a parish. "Rome's famous for it," said one parish priest in Italy who asked not to be named. "They've got to go somewhere, and so are given something innocuous to do in Rome." For some, that perception was underscored last year, when a senior ranking monsignor was involved in a high-speed police chase after being pulled over in a Rome district known for male prostitution."
Would be funny if they caught the pope doing this kinda BS. That would probably seriously discredit the church.
MasterOfPuppets
10-18-2007, 05:44 PM
lol, cbf.
DESTRUCTION
10-18-2007, 08:45 PM
thats fucking dumb and, being gay is totally against what the bible says...
yeah this may seem wrong but homosexuality is completley bad in the bible and yet this faggot is a priest. hope he aint a priest for long
Creative
10-18-2007, 09:12 PM
agreed. ^
he's making himself look dumb beyond belief. :(
Spyder
10-20-2007, 08:53 PM
Where does it say being gay is bad in the Bible? The only thing even close was something about perverts or some BS like that.
I don't think gays are a big deal, I just think that child molesters are what is really wrong. Anybody caught molesting a child should get their balls cut off.
Creative
10-20-2007, 10:17 PM
It talks about homosexuality and how it's wrong. I can't quote anything but it says something along the lines of you shouldn't marry your own gender, etc.
Snooperz
10-20-2007, 10:27 PM
Where does it say being gay is bad in the Bible? The only thing even close was something about perverts or some BS like that.
I don't think gays are a big deal, I just think that child molesters are what is really wrong. Anybody caught molesting a child should get their balls cut off.
Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."
1 Corinthians 6:9 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders"
Romans 1:26-27 - "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."
THE GOD HATH SPOKEN *moth
DESTRUCTION
10-20-2007, 10:54 PM
GG snoop
Creative
10-20-2007, 11:12 PM
Yeah, gw snoop
Saman
10-21-2007, 12:22 AM
1/10~3/100 people is gay*moth
Spyder
10-21-2007, 02:29 AM
What translation is that from? I don't even think the word "homosexual" is an Aramaic word (the language the Bible was originally written in).
I have an Aramaic Bible upstairs, I'll have to check that. Chances are good that the Bible you got that from was one of the heavily-modified translations.
DESTRUCTION
10-21-2007, 03:08 AM
that second line may not be from an older version but i can promise you its in there implying or clearly saying the same thing... i dont feel like finding it atm sice its 3 in the morning but homosexuality is huge no no if youre a christrian.
the "modified" versions would be the versions that accept homosexuality.
i googled a little bit.... and here ya go, a bunch of versions all "modified" in some sort of way
ASV: (American Standard Version, 1901) "And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
Darby: (J.N. Darby Translation, 1890): "And if a man lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall certainly be put to death; their blood is upon them."
ESV: (English Standard Version): "If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."
HNV: (Hebrew Names Version): "If a man lies with a male, as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
KJV: (King James Version): "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them."
LB: (Living Bible): "The penalty for homosexual acts is death to both parties. They have brought it upon themselves."
NASB: (New American Standard Bible): "'If {there is} a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them. "
Net Bible: "If a man has sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman, the two of them have committed an abomination. They must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves." 1
NIV: (New International Version) "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."
NKJV: (New King James Version) "If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them."
NLT: (New Living Translation): "The penalty for homosexual acts is death to both parties. They have committed a detestable act, and are guilty of a capital offense."
RSV: (Revised Standard Version): "If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death; their blood is upon them."
Webster: (Noah Webster Version, 1833): "If a man also shall lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them."
Young: (Robert Young Literal Translation, 1898) "And a man who lieth with a male as one lieth with a woman; abomination both of them have done; they are certainly put to death; their blood [is] on them."
Saman
10-21-2007, 05:28 AM
are you guys calling for death to the homos?
MasterOfPuppets
10-21-2007, 12:07 PM
are you guys calling for death to the homos?
No. We don't want to lose half of our clan.
Snooperz
10-21-2007, 12:57 PM
What translation is that from? I don't even think the word "homosexual" is an Aramaic word (the language the Bible was originally written in).
I have an Aramaic Bible upstairs, I'll have to check that. Chances are good that the Bible you got that from was one of the heavily-modified translations.
It's from the NIV (the new international version), one of the (if not the) most commonly used translation now days.
http://www.anointedlinks.com/why_niv.html
So, no, it's not "heavily-modified" at all my friendly friend. It mostly just takes out words like "lieth" and "hath" etc that we don't normally use in today's modern language, among other similar things.
NinjaGator
10-21-2007, 01:10 PM
what's so wrong if the aramic had a word that's similar to homosexual? It only means "same sex"; it's not like its a bad word or anything.
Snooperz
10-21-2007, 10:35 PM
what's so wrong if the aramic had a word that's similar to homosexual? It only means "same sex"; it's not like its a bad word or anything.
I don't think anybody said that'd be a bad thing.
NinjaGator
10-22-2007, 02:15 AM
I know, but spyder made it sound like they wouldn't have a word similar to it in their language.
Creative
10-22-2007, 06:11 PM
are you guys calling for death to the homos?
No. We don't want to lose half of our clan.
^ made me lol'.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.0 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.